Cut State Spending or Increase State Revenue?

by: Maximum Lawman Thursday, November 13th, 2008

A forum Thursday sponsored by a state merchants association saw a panel of legislators chime in on a gloomy budget prognosis issued by Gov. M. Jodi Rell, and business owners who attended saw two different philosophies on how to address the crisis. While Democrats Chris Donovan and Don Williams talked about leaving all options open, Rep. Larry Cafero and Sen. Len Fasano were more pointed in their answers: Rather than foraging for new sources of revenue such as increasing taxes or creating new fees and fines for Connecticut businesses, legislators should consider spending cuts. “The debate has to be about spending, not revenue,” said Cafero, R-Norwalk. Roughly two dozen people were at the session, put on by the Connecticut Retail Merchants Association. State spending was a concern for several people in the audience, who questioned why legislators don’t run the state like a business. Discussion topics included early retirement for some state employees, eliminating the state’s sales tax and easing taxes and regulations on businesses. Spending, though, came up repeatedly. Both Cafero and Fasano, R-North Haven, talked about duplication of services in agencies.

« Floren Gets Racers Moving! | Home | Pam Sawyer Pals Around with Girl Scouts »

2 Responses to “Cut State Spending or Increase State Revenue?”

PatricK Stein Said:  Vote: Add rating 1  Subtract rating 0  

It is time to introduce the ERIP and let anyone 52 years of age with 25 years of state service to GO…………. We need to save money and reduce the size of state goverment…………..Governor Rell should have done this last year…………ERIP at 52 years old and save the State millions of dollars………………

Comment made on January 7th, 2010 at 1:44 am
Edwin Norse Said:  Vote: Add rating 0  Subtract rating 0  

Maybe it is time to do both, so that we don’t add to the burden of the backs of the poor by cutting services that are critical to their survival.

Expecting people to find $10 pairs of glasses, is not only short sighted, but cruel………….but that’s what the DSS Commissioner testified to the other day as a necessary cut.

If the wealthy are paying a lower percentage of tax than the rest of the population, wouldn’t that seem like a place to start?

Somebody here is just not getting it.

Ed Norse Portland

Comment made on March 9th, 2010 at 3:17 pm
 

Leave a Comment