House Republicans Offer Solution to Looming Budget Deficit

by: Maximum Lawman Thursday, April 15th, 2010


House Republicans have a plan to erase the more than $700 million deficit Connecticut will face in the new fiscal year beginning July 1—without increasing your taxes. They pitched their plan today during a news conference at the Capitol, where House Republican Leader Larry Cafero backed by Rep. Vin Candelora (pictured) and others insisted super-majority Democrats who control the legislature make the same difficult financial choices residents make when their budgets get pinched. That means cutting back — adhering to a common sense principle your parents probably instilled in you: Don’t spend more money than you make. Unfortunately, business closures and widespread unemployment left the state without the revenue it had in the past. So, we’re left with a range of programs and services we just can’t pay for. Cafero and his colleagues view this crisis as an opportunity to identify programs that work—and those that don’t. Contraction, and savings, would follow. Democrats, meanwhile, have lobbied for hefty tax increases (even targeting sick people) to keep this ailing train—our government—chugging along as it had. Opinion polls have told us that residents favor the common sense Republican approach—one that shrinks the public workforce, preserves municipal and school aide while also setting aside money to encourage job growth.

“We must fix the budget hole we face in three weeks without raising taxes and without gutting social service programs. We must make government smaller and do away with programs we can no longer afford. Every household in Connecticut has faced these choices and has made the tough decisions we are confronting today,’’ Cafero told the news media.

Candelora, a Finance Committee member, explained the balanced plan would see companies that hire unemployed workers receive tax credits, and it establishes a $25 million small business revolving loan fund while eliminating the controversial Business Entity Tax—a tax businesses pay whether they turn a profit or not.

“This budget requires everyone to help solve our ongoing fiscal crisis. If we ignore the problems now, they will become insurmountable,’’ said Cafero, further explaining that it offers a flexible menu of choices to create savings from concessions that have validated by the non-partisan Office of Fiscal Analysis.

Here are the details:

  • $58 million in line item cuts to 2009 levels;
  • $64 million in early retirement for state workers;
  • $10 million in state agency consolidations;
  • $6.4 million to shed state office leases;
  • $20 million in privatization of state functions;
  • $150 million in state worker concessions, including wage freezes, furlough days and health care;
  • $3.8 million in legislative pay cuts, elimination of franked mail and travel.

The budget also makes significant investments in job creation and retirement security:

  • $200 million will be paid into the state employee pensions;
  • The Business Entity Tax is eliminated to save companies $32 million;
  • A Small Business Revolving Loan Fund of $25 million is created;
  • Tax credits of up to $17.5 million will be available to companies that hire off unemployment rolls.

Cafero said that the legislature took the first step toward eliminating the state’s budget woes on Tuesday when the House voted to erase the current state budget deficit of $350 million for 2010. The legislature cannot adjourn on May 5 without finishing the job and addressing the $700 million that looms July 1.

Republicans outlined a variety of small and large potential savings in the state work force. Cafero noted that if all state workers agree to freeze wages for one year it would save $183 million. One furlough day results in a $9 million savings, he noted.

“We cannot walk away from the fiscal crisis that has been created by declining revenues and a refusal to cut spending. More than 100,000 people have lost their jobs in this recession and families are hurting. Raising taxes will not solve the problem and walking away and ignoring what we are facing this summer would be an act of cowardice,’’ Cafero said.

He called upon Democrats to immediately come together as we did on April 13 and work toward a reasonable solution.

« | Home | »

16 Responses to “House Republicans Offer Solution to Looming Budget Deficit”

Marie Egbert Said:  Vote: Add rating 4  Subtract rating 4  

I SUPPORT YOUR “Common Sense Budget”!!

Comment made on April 15th, 2010 at 8:11 pm
DrHunterSThompson Said:  Vote: Add rating 3  Subtract rating 3  

very sensible and very well thought out.

i encourage all our legislators to support this.

thank you.

Comment made on April 16th, 2010 at 1:42 pm
sandra martin Said:  Vote: Add rating 2  Subtract rating 3  

I think everyone should support this plan.

Comment made on April 16th, 2010 at 3:45 pm
Tom Reed Said:  Vote: Add rating 1  Subtract rating 0  

How does Rep. Cafero and the rest of these folks think they are going to get all these state employee givebacks. The State (Gov. Rell) has very legal contracts with 14 unions that runs through 6/30/2012 that were negotiated last year. Wage freezes, furlough days, increased co-pays, etc. were all part of these negotiations. Longevity payments are also part of union contracts for most state employees. It’s naive to think that the unions are going to open up these contracts to any type of re-negotiation at this point.

Comment made on April 17th, 2010 at 1:03 am
A.J. Cuozzo Said:  Vote: Add rating 1  Subtract rating 0  

Great idea. It’s about time these people learn to live in the same world as those of us in the manufacturing sector. I remember taking a 10% cut in pay for one year during a poor time for the company that I worked for. I was happy to just hang onto my medical plan.
All taxpayers should support this plan.

Comment made on April 17th, 2010 at 1:12 am
Walt Glomb Said:  Vote: Add rating 1  Subtract rating 0  

Is there a budget book for this plan? I’d like to look at a few key line items.

For example, how does this change the budgets of private non-profit community service providers for DDS (to be merged into the new department.)

Comment made on April 19th, 2010 at 12:40 am
S. Perkins Said:  Vote: Add rating 0  Subtract rating 6  

It may be painful for state employees to agree to more concessions but it is necessary. All CT citizens are sharing the pain… state employees have had things pretty good for a long time, but now they have to sacrifice like everyone else. If their unions would rather have them lose their jobs, the unions aren’t looking out for their best interests. You don’t get longevity payments on unemployment! This is a good plan.

Comment made on April 19th, 2010 at 10:09 pm
PatricK Stein Said:  Vote: Add rating 5  Subtract rating 2  

Finally the RELL admin station has come to its senses and proposed an ERIP.
This will stream line state government and get us back on track to slow down this out of control spending.
Yes the unions will loose thousand of dollars in membership due’s , SO now the unions can stronghold the private sector…………………….

Comment made on April 21st, 2010 at 2:26 am
steve kozak Said:  Vote: Add rating 4  Subtract rating 0  

It’s about time all politicians regardless of which party they belong to realize that spending must be cut and controlled in order to reduce the deficit. Represent your constitutents the way they want to be represented. Get this state back on its feet and get people back to work. We can’t afford more taxes to fund your uncontrolled spending. I would support Mr. Cafero’s proposals until someone presents a better solution.

Comment made on April 21st, 2010 at 6:20 pm
Allan Szast Said:  Vote: Add rating 3  Subtract rating 0  

Here’s a new and novel idea. How about we stop penalizing hard working Connecticut residents and start taking away from people that are in Ct. illegally. Why are we rewarding criminals (illegal=criminal) and punishing law abiding citizens?

Comment made on April 22nd, 2010 at 2:04 pm
Jaime Said:  Vote: Add rating 3  Subtract rating 0  

It’s seems like every time there is a budget problem the state employees take the blame for it. How about these Deputy and Assitant Deputy Commissioners that don’t do anything? Why not get rid of them they get well over 90 grand a year? How about some of these judges that get over 250 grand a year we can do with out a few of them too. I remembered being laidoff for 6 months before I was able to get a job and I am a state employee when that happened.

Comment made on April 22nd, 2010 at 6:38 pm
Laura Said:  Vote: Add rating 4  Subtract rating 0  

I agree that State workers have already given back and even continue to do so. The idea that State workers have it easy is a thing of the past. Over the past 20+ years State employment has changed drastically, we did have it good back decades ago, now we are paid less then comparable positions in the private sector, we just have Unions to protect what little we have left, which we pay for ourselves. Most private industry offers better health coverage for less money, State employees pay a lot, per paycheck, for decent coverage. You have some highly educated workers working for peanuts while their private industry equals bring home better paychecks, why because they are public servants,not representing the interests of some board of directors or shareholders. You want to pair down the work force, which has already taken numerous hits over the years, them wait for your streets to be plowed, wait for that State Trooper to come at some point, hopefully, your Corrections units will be staffed and someone won’t be using your house for a hide out when they walk away from the local prison. Oh, yeah take the day of for DMV issues, with less people at the window it could be a long wait! Remember the State offers a lot of services (some we take for granted every day) and the less employees or even discontented employees you have you will feel it in the long run. The best way to save some cash is to investigate all the fraud going on with State services, start looking at citizens that have been on the system for an extended period of time, not just in the recent 2 years as a result of the economic turn down, but the abusers who the tax payers constantly pay for and they are living large as a result. Send out notices that their benefits will cease in 3-6 months, therefore, they need to seek employment ASAP. The State can no longer support you, go to work like the rest of us and contribute fully to the system for a change without withdrawing from it.

Comment made on April 22nd, 2010 at 7:28 pm
Chuck a luck Said:  Vote: Add rating 0  Subtract rating 0  

I agree with Laura about ceasing state benefits to certain people. There is a fair amount of people receiving state checks and there is nothing physically wrong with them, so why not get a job and get off of state. Also there are too many commissioners that earn a pretty penny that are not needed why not get rid of a few? Time and time again when there is a budget crisis the governor whines and complains that there is no money to pay for certain services but there is money to pay for personal travels. Who are the first people the Governor looks at to try and fix the budget is the state employees, and believe me when I say this, state employees do not have the best health care plan or pension. We do contribute to our pension as well as private sector employees so don’t come and say that our pension is all paid for by the state. We are all in this together but it seems that the state employees are the first ones to be crucified instead of taxing the rich bankers who live in this glorious state that started this recession in the first place. Why not tax the bonus checks the bankers received no thanks to Bush and his administration? And where do these bankers work, the private sector.

Comment made on April 22nd, 2010 at 8:07 pm
Heather Said:  Vote: Add rating 0  Subtract rating 0  

I agree with Laura and Chuck and also work for the State, it seems its always cut the workforce and leave the management alone. Different hiring times mean different benefits, some of us pay into our own underfunded pension. Our copays have already gone up, all the overtime some think we get has been cut back putting not only the public at risk in the winter but those of us trying to get to our assigned locations. Yes I’m grateful to have a job as well as a second job on the weekends. So as stated I see so many people out of work on state money for various reasons, extended unemployment benefits, what incentive is there to look for a job if you can just sit back and collect.

Comment made on April 22nd, 2010 at 9:47 pm
sri bala Said:  Vote: Add rating 3  Subtract rating 0  

I am a state of CT employee.I would like to take the retirement offer. I am given a choice. It is between me and the state of CT.i would like my union in the negotiations,but not to be spoiler.
I do not want the unions to safe guard their interests at my expense.

Comment made on April 24th, 2010 at 2:40 pm
shawn Said:  Vote: Add rating 3  Subtract rating 0  

The early retirement plan shoud target tier I emploees who may be as young as 50 –but have 30+ years of service.

Comment made on April 25th, 2010 at 4:26 pm
 

Leave a Comment